I'm looking forward to reading this book.--Dr. Louie F. Rodriguez
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Study Details Educational Challenges Facing U.S. Latino Community
Dec 15 2008 1:50PM
Lydia Gil--EFE
In their forthcoming book, "The Latino Education Crisis: The Consequences of Failed Social Policies," two U.S. professors detail the educational challenges confronting this country's Latino community.
UCLA's Patricia Gandara and Frances Contreras of the University of Washington examine not only the causes but also the social and economic consequences of this worrying educational gap.
According to the study, Latinos, the country's biggest and fastest-growing minority, academically are being left behind at a dangerous rate.
One of the more worrying figures cited in the study is that while other ethnic minorities have managed to increase the percentage of their members who complete university studies, about half of Latino students don't even finish high school, a level that is similar to what it was three decades ago.
Upon consideration of the rapid widening of the income gap between those who have a university diploma and those who do not, one can appreciate why the researchers have called this crisis alarming and potentially devastating for the Latino community.
However, although the study is quantitatively rigorous, it does not limit itself to simply forecasting the crisis, but rather calls for action to change the trend in the figures.
The book indicates that, in contrast to other immigrant groups in the past, Latinos nowadays will not be able to easily exceed the social and economic status of their parents and grandparents.
According to the authors, U.S. society imposes conditions that exceed the ability of immigrants to overcome educational and socio-economic barriers.
They say, however, that the educational gap between Latinos and other groups is not completely related, nor even in large measure, to conditions linked to immigration, given that several recent studies concluded that bilingual or recently arrived students tend to come out better academically than Latinos born and raised in the United States.
The study says that nowadays, just one in every 10 Latinos obtains a university degree compared to one in four non-Hispanic whites and one in three Asian Americans.
These figures show that the graduation rate among Latinos has not increased in recent decades, which, added to the population increase among the Latino community, translates into a serious prognosis for the country's economy.
The authors provide as an example the state of California, where by 2020 it is expected there will be a 11 percent decline in per capita income if there is no intervention in favor of students poorly represented in the university system.
The call to action is urgent not only for California, but also for other states including Arizona and Texas, where Latinos comprise a high percentage of the population and where the inequalities in access to university education are mirrored.
According to the study, the statistics reflect a problem that goes beyond the faults in the educational system or the lack of resources there into the "American mythology" that with enough effort, everyone can achieve success in this country without regard to the circumstances they confront.
By not focusing exclusively on immigration, language, the lack of systemic resources or administration policy, Gandara and Contreras provide a comprehensive vision of the causes of educational disparity between the different ethnic groups in the United States and the challenges confronting the Latino community, in particular.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Gov. Crist proposes universities raise own tuitions (from Miami Herald)
The Governor was quoted as saying that Florida has the lowest tuition in the country. I would add that Florida also has amongst the lowest wages, higher gas prices (on average .20 cents more than the country average), and outrageous services such as medical, home utilities, etc. When you consider one of the largest public universities in the state, FIU, many of its students are first-generation college students without much financial capital to rely on. For those who thought that a few thousand was already an impossible cost for a college education, these increases just push those already on the margins further away from the possibility of attending college. --Dr. Louie F. Rodriguez
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Miami Herald
Posted on Thu, Nov. 20, 2008
Gov. Crist proposes universities raise own tuitions
BY JENNIFER LIBERTO, STEVE BOUSQUET AND MARC CAPUTO
Bowing to the pleas of Florida's cash-starved state universities, Gov. Charlie Crist Thursday announced a plan that would give all 11 schools the power to raise tuition by as much as 15 percent yearly.
The proposal could raise about $1.5 billion over the next seven years for the universities. It also could affect a lawsuit over whether the Board of Governors or the state Legislature sets tuition rates.
The Legislature needs to sign off on Crist's package. Its leaders issued statements of support but said they needed to see more details. Crist, who had once opposed raising tuition rates in tough economic times, explained he simply ``changed my mind.''
''Things evolve,'' Crist said. ``You produce good jobs by having great education.''
Crist also stressed that, even if tuition rates increase by 15 percent annually, ``we'll still have the cheapest tuition in the country.''
To cushion the blow of higher tuition, Crist wants to boost financial aid to the state's poorest students because 30 percent of the new money raised would be used to lower tuition and fees for low-income students. Crist projects $200 million in new financial aid will be available by 2015.
The aid package, though, wouldn't help cover tuition increases for students who receive the state's Bright Futures scholarship program, one of Florida's biggest middle-class entitlements.
Asked how he could explain the need for higher tuition to struggling middle-class families, Crist said he would tell them students will now ``have a great opportunity to get an even better education.''
The state's five largest research universities -- including the University of South Florida in Tampa and Florida International University in Miami -- were given the authority this year to raise tuition by 15 percent annually.
Crist's proposal was developed quietly in conversations between his education advisor Dean Colson, the Board of Governors that oversees the state university system, university presidents and the Council of 100, an influential group of business leaders.
Crist likely wouldn't have announced the legislative package without some indication of support from state legislative leaders. Both House Speaker Ray Sansom and Senate President Jeff Atwater were noncommittal Wednesday and said they looked forward to seeing the details.
''We thank Gov. Crist for his proposal, and we look forward to working with him to accomplish our common goal of creating a great higher education system for the people of Florida,'' Sansom, a Destin Republican, said in a brief written statement Thursday.
Atwater also applauded Crist ``for his leadership.''
By contrast, Senate Democratic Leader Al Lawson of Tallahassee blasted Crist for the proposal and urged the governor to rethink his decision.
''This move puts higher education even further out of reach,'' Lawson said. ``Florida ranks among the highest for foreclosures, job loss and bankruptcies. Dumping tuition hikes into the laps of students and their families is the wrong move at the wrong time. It's the latest in a long line of bad moves shifting the state's funding obligations down to the people, and the people are suffering enough.''
FIU President Modesto ''Mitch'' Maidique said that because his university got a head start this year and was allowed to raise tuition, the change will have little immediate effect. The long-term advantage of the plan, he said, is that it will allow more students to attend universities. Cash-strapped institutions have had to turn students away and the small tuition increases -- coupled with the increases in financial aid -- will help the entire state, he said.
Florida Atlantic University President Frank Brogan said the proposal was ''long overdue'' and welcomes the opportunity for the university's board to determine what to do. He said FAU is unlikely to take advantage of the full 15 percent tuition hike because of the number of ''economically fragile'' students on its rolls. He said 47 percent of the FAU student body is made up of minorities and most of them receive some form of financial assistance.
''If given this ability, the Board of Trustees will very carefully weigh what the tipping point will be economically for our students,'' Brogan said.
Sen. Charlie Justice, D-St. Petersburg, works at the University of South Florida and acknowledges the need for more funding for universities. ''We're making it harder for Florida families to afford colleges,'' he said. ``Everyone knows when the economy turns south more and more people head to colleges. This is something we really need to talk about before we pass.''
The Legislature and the newly approved Board of Governors have been at a standstill over who controls tuition due to a lawsuit filed by former Gov. and U.S. Sen. Bob Graham. Graham says a 2002 voter-approved constitutional amendment removed the Legislature from major university decisions by setting up the Board of Governors. State legislators say the amendment wasn't intended to give the board such autonomy.
Graham said he has ''concerns'' about Crist's proposal because it rests on the Legislature, which has a poor track record of funding education. He said there needs to be a guarantee that the Legislature won't just cut higher-ed money while raising tuition rates.
''I'm just concerned that the increase isn't part of a larger strategy to reverse this decline we've seen in the last 20 years in higher education,'' Graham said, ``and it could become almost a narcotic to cover up the real problems by shifting more of the total cost of education to students while the state does not keep up its end of the bargain.''
Crist's plan calls for the Board of Governors to delegate the power to each university board of trustees to figure out how much of the tuition hike they plan to charge, the draft memo said. They could raise tuition 15 percent a year, as long as the increase doesn't exceed 40 percent in three years.
Bright Futures could be another sticking point in Crist's plan. The wildly popular program for students with good grades isn't based on financial need -- and it's growing faster than the state's ability to pay for it. Bright Futures is supported with state money from the lottery that has seen a drop-off in ticket sales as Florida residents have less discretionary money.
The proposed tuition changes would shift the burden of paying for the state's higher education system away from general taxpayers and more toward students. Not only would Bright Futures recipients pay more, but so would those who bought prepaid tuition plans after July 1, 2007.
Tuition at Florida's 11 universities ranges from about $3,400 to about $4,000 a year for in-state students.
Universities are facing unprecedented financial pressures. With tuition rates capped and costs rising, schools have been slashing undergraduate enrollment, cutting academic programs and wiping out degree programs. They've also begun laying off faculty and staff statewide.
Facing another year without salary increases, many top professors are being lured out-of-state.
''Tuition for a full year of college education in Florida is cheaper than sending a 4-year-old to day care for a few hours a day -- it's just too cheap,'' said University of North Florida President John A. Delaney.
Delaney and other university presidents who attended Crist's news conference praised the governor for his ''bold'' leadership.
The group that lobbies the Legislature on behalf of students, the Florida Student Association, knew about the governor's tuition plan and said students are in a bind. They're concerned about tuition hikes, but they're also worried about the condition of the higher education system.
''The general sentiment is that tuition can go up. They understand it needs to go up,'' said Chris Krampert, FSA executive director. ``But, it's a Hail Mary giant leap forward, instead of taking a step forward.''
Higher education advocates who have been hearing about such plans on the sidelines say they approve of the move, especially imposing the tuition increases on state-funded Bright Futures scholarships as well.
''I applaud the governor for dealing with this, especially in a tight budget year,'' said Steve Uhlfedler, a former Florida State University board trustee.
Herald/Times Bureau reporters Alex Leary and Mary Ellen Klas contributed to this report.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Miami Herald
Posted on Thu, Nov. 20, 2008
Gov. Crist proposes universities raise own tuitions
BY JENNIFER LIBERTO, STEVE BOUSQUET AND MARC CAPUTO
Bowing to the pleas of Florida's cash-starved state universities, Gov. Charlie Crist Thursday announced a plan that would give all 11 schools the power to raise tuition by as much as 15 percent yearly.
The proposal could raise about $1.5 billion over the next seven years for the universities. It also could affect a lawsuit over whether the Board of Governors or the state Legislature sets tuition rates.
The Legislature needs to sign off on Crist's package. Its leaders issued statements of support but said they needed to see more details. Crist, who had once opposed raising tuition rates in tough economic times, explained he simply ``changed my mind.''
''Things evolve,'' Crist said. ``You produce good jobs by having great education.''
Crist also stressed that, even if tuition rates increase by 15 percent annually, ``we'll still have the cheapest tuition in the country.''
To cushion the blow of higher tuition, Crist wants to boost financial aid to the state's poorest students because 30 percent of the new money raised would be used to lower tuition and fees for low-income students. Crist projects $200 million in new financial aid will be available by 2015.
The aid package, though, wouldn't help cover tuition increases for students who receive the state's Bright Futures scholarship program, one of Florida's biggest middle-class entitlements.
Asked how he could explain the need for higher tuition to struggling middle-class families, Crist said he would tell them students will now ``have a great opportunity to get an even better education.''
The state's five largest research universities -- including the University of South Florida in Tampa and Florida International University in Miami -- were given the authority this year to raise tuition by 15 percent annually.
Crist's proposal was developed quietly in conversations between his education advisor Dean Colson, the Board of Governors that oversees the state university system, university presidents and the Council of 100, an influential group of business leaders.
Crist likely wouldn't have announced the legislative package without some indication of support from state legislative leaders. Both House Speaker Ray Sansom and Senate President Jeff Atwater were noncommittal Wednesday and said they looked forward to seeing the details.
''We thank Gov. Crist for his proposal, and we look forward to working with him to accomplish our common goal of creating a great higher education system for the people of Florida,'' Sansom, a Destin Republican, said in a brief written statement Thursday.
Atwater also applauded Crist ``for his leadership.''
By contrast, Senate Democratic Leader Al Lawson of Tallahassee blasted Crist for the proposal and urged the governor to rethink his decision.
''This move puts higher education even further out of reach,'' Lawson said. ``Florida ranks among the highest for foreclosures, job loss and bankruptcies. Dumping tuition hikes into the laps of students and their families is the wrong move at the wrong time. It's the latest in a long line of bad moves shifting the state's funding obligations down to the people, and the people are suffering enough.''
FIU President Modesto ''Mitch'' Maidique said that because his university got a head start this year and was allowed to raise tuition, the change will have little immediate effect. The long-term advantage of the plan, he said, is that it will allow more students to attend universities. Cash-strapped institutions have had to turn students away and the small tuition increases -- coupled with the increases in financial aid -- will help the entire state, he said.
Florida Atlantic University President Frank Brogan said the proposal was ''long overdue'' and welcomes the opportunity for the university's board to determine what to do. He said FAU is unlikely to take advantage of the full 15 percent tuition hike because of the number of ''economically fragile'' students on its rolls. He said 47 percent of the FAU student body is made up of minorities and most of them receive some form of financial assistance.
''If given this ability, the Board of Trustees will very carefully weigh what the tipping point will be economically for our students,'' Brogan said.
Sen. Charlie Justice, D-St. Petersburg, works at the University of South Florida and acknowledges the need for more funding for universities. ''We're making it harder for Florida families to afford colleges,'' he said. ``Everyone knows when the economy turns south more and more people head to colleges. This is something we really need to talk about before we pass.''
The Legislature and the newly approved Board of Governors have been at a standstill over who controls tuition due to a lawsuit filed by former Gov. and U.S. Sen. Bob Graham. Graham says a 2002 voter-approved constitutional amendment removed the Legislature from major university decisions by setting up the Board of Governors. State legislators say the amendment wasn't intended to give the board such autonomy.
Graham said he has ''concerns'' about Crist's proposal because it rests on the Legislature, which has a poor track record of funding education. He said there needs to be a guarantee that the Legislature won't just cut higher-ed money while raising tuition rates.
''I'm just concerned that the increase isn't part of a larger strategy to reverse this decline we've seen in the last 20 years in higher education,'' Graham said, ``and it could become almost a narcotic to cover up the real problems by shifting more of the total cost of education to students while the state does not keep up its end of the bargain.''
Crist's plan calls for the Board of Governors to delegate the power to each university board of trustees to figure out how much of the tuition hike they plan to charge, the draft memo said. They could raise tuition 15 percent a year, as long as the increase doesn't exceed 40 percent in three years.
Bright Futures could be another sticking point in Crist's plan. The wildly popular program for students with good grades isn't based on financial need -- and it's growing faster than the state's ability to pay for it. Bright Futures is supported with state money from the lottery that has seen a drop-off in ticket sales as Florida residents have less discretionary money.
The proposed tuition changes would shift the burden of paying for the state's higher education system away from general taxpayers and more toward students. Not only would Bright Futures recipients pay more, but so would those who bought prepaid tuition plans after July 1, 2007.
Tuition at Florida's 11 universities ranges from about $3,400 to about $4,000 a year for in-state students.
Universities are facing unprecedented financial pressures. With tuition rates capped and costs rising, schools have been slashing undergraduate enrollment, cutting academic programs and wiping out degree programs. They've also begun laying off faculty and staff statewide.
Facing another year without salary increases, many top professors are being lured out-of-state.
''Tuition for a full year of college education in Florida is cheaper than sending a 4-year-old to day care for a few hours a day -- it's just too cheap,'' said University of North Florida President John A. Delaney.
Delaney and other university presidents who attended Crist's news conference praised the governor for his ''bold'' leadership.
The group that lobbies the Legislature on behalf of students, the Florida Student Association, knew about the governor's tuition plan and said students are in a bind. They're concerned about tuition hikes, but they're also worried about the condition of the higher education system.
''The general sentiment is that tuition can go up. They understand it needs to go up,'' said Chris Krampert, FSA executive director. ``But, it's a Hail Mary giant leap forward, instead of taking a step forward.''
Higher education advocates who have been hearing about such plans on the sidelines say they approve of the move, especially imposing the tuition increases on state-funded Bright Futures scholarships as well.
''I applaud the governor for dealing with this, especially in a tight budget year,'' said Steve Uhlfedler, a former Florida State University board trustee.
Herald/Times Bureau reporters Alex Leary and Mary Ellen Klas contributed to this report.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Hispanic Workers Hardest Hit by Economy (from the Providence Journal)
Much of the dropout research demonstrates that students who leave school before graduation tend to do so because they have to help support their families. We should expect a rise in dropout rates given the challenges with the economy. -Dr. Louie F. Rodriguez
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Hispanic workers hardest hit by economy
Hispanic Workers Seen As Hard Hit By Downturn
Providence Journal By Andy Smith November 16, 2008
Hispanic family income fell between 2000 and 2007 and the recession is expected to further erode their purchasing power.
A report recently issued by the Economic Policy Institute, a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, D.C., that focuses on low- and middle-income workers, found that Hispanic workers across the country experienced little economic progress between 2000 and 2007. According to the authors of the report, that spells disheartening news for Hispanic workers in the current economic crisis.
"I expect that Hispanics will be hurt very badly," said Algernon Austin, director of the program on race, ethnicity and the economy for the institute, and co-author of the report.
Austin and co-author Marie T. Mora found that median Hispanic family income fell by 2.2 percent between 2000 and 2007, compared with a 9.5 percent growth rate among Hispanic families in the 1990s.
Median weekly earnings for Hispanic workers grew by 4.7 percent from 2000 to 2007, from $480 a week to $503 a week. Median income for all U.S. workers experienced very little growth in the same period, but at $695 per week it was significantly higher than that of Hispanic families.
"In sum, the Hispanic population began the 2000s business cycle significantly worse off economically than the nation as a whole, and they are ending the cycle in virtually the same place," the report concluded. "Unfortunately, as we face what looks like a severe economic downturn, Hispanics run the risk of falling further behind."
Ramon Martinez, president and chief executive officer of Progreso Latino in Rhode Island, said he's in general agreement with the report. "Rhode Island is a microcosm of the country ... I think the recessionary impact on Hispanics will be severe." Martinez said Progreso Latino's mission is to empower the Hispanic community through education, training and advocacy.
According to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, national unemployment rates for Hispanics jumped from 7.8 percent in September to 8.8 percent last month. The national unemployment rate for all workers is 6.5 percent. The unemployment rate in Rhode Island for all workers is 8.8 percent, the highest in the country. (The state Department of Labor and Training does not categorize monthly unemployment rates by ethnicity.)
A key factor in rising unemployment among Hispanic workers has been the collapse of the U.S. housing market and the subsequent implosion of the construction industry. According to federal statistics, since its peak in September 2006, the construction industry has lost 663,000 jobs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Hispanic workers hardest hit by economy
Hispanic Workers Seen As Hard Hit By Downturn
Providence Journal By Andy Smith November 16, 2008
Hispanic family income fell between 2000 and 2007 and the recession is expected to further erode their purchasing power.
A report recently issued by the Economic Policy Institute, a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, D.C., that focuses on low- and middle-income workers, found that Hispanic workers across the country experienced little economic progress between 2000 and 2007. According to the authors of the report, that spells disheartening news for Hispanic workers in the current economic crisis.
"I expect that Hispanics will be hurt very badly," said Algernon Austin, director of the program on race, ethnicity and the economy for the institute, and co-author of the report.
Austin and co-author Marie T. Mora found that median Hispanic family income fell by 2.2 percent between 2000 and 2007, compared with a 9.5 percent growth rate among Hispanic families in the 1990s.
Median weekly earnings for Hispanic workers grew by 4.7 percent from 2000 to 2007, from $480 a week to $503 a week. Median income for all U.S. workers experienced very little growth in the same period, but at $695 per week it was significantly higher than that of Hispanic families.
"In sum, the Hispanic population began the 2000s business cycle significantly worse off economically than the nation as a whole, and they are ending the cycle in virtually the same place," the report concluded. "Unfortunately, as we face what looks like a severe economic downturn, Hispanics run the risk of falling further behind."
Ramon Martinez, president and chief executive officer of Progreso Latino in Rhode Island, said he's in general agreement with the report. "Rhode Island is a microcosm of the country ... I think the recessionary impact on Hispanics will be severe." Martinez said Progreso Latino's mission is to empower the Hispanic community through education, training and advocacy.
According to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, national unemployment rates for Hispanics jumped from 7.8 percent in September to 8.8 percent last month. The national unemployment rate for all workers is 6.5 percent. The unemployment rate in Rhode Island for all workers is 8.8 percent, the highest in the country. (The state Department of Labor and Training does not categorize monthly unemployment rates by ethnicity.)
A key factor in rising unemployment among Hispanic workers has been the collapse of the U.S. housing market and the subsequent implosion of the construction industry. According to federal statistics, since its peak in September 2006, the construction industry has lost 663,000 jobs.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
UC Berkeley Students Call on Obama to Enact the Dream Act (From the Berkeley Daily Planet)
A direct challenge to the next President and Congress. --Dr. Louie F. Rodriguez
---------------------------------------------------------------------
News Updates:
UC Berkeley Students Call On Obama to Enact the Dream Act
by Riya Bhattacharjee
Friday November 14, 2008
UC Berkeley students joined the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights, and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN) Thursday to launch a national campaign urging President-elect Barack Obama to enact the federal Dream Act, which would legalize federal financial aid and open a path of citizenship for undocumented immigrant college students across the nation, who are otherwise entrapped in complicated paperwork.
Held at the MLK Student Union on campus, the event—which was organized by BAMN and co-sponsored by Rising Immigrant Scholars through Education, the Latino Business Students Association, the gender and women’s studies and Spanish and Portuguese studies departments at the university and the Chancellor’s Student Opportunity Fund—started with a group of undocumented students from around the Bay Area testifying about their struggles in the absence of federal financial aid.
Calls to Chancellor Robert Birgeneau’s office for comment were not returned by press time, but a campus spokesperson confirmed that the chancellor supports the Dream Act. Birgeneau wrote an op-ed piece in support of the act for the UC Berkeley student newspaper The Daily Californian, Nov. 5.
In California, undocumented students have the right to attend a public university but are not allowed to apply for financial aid, something Thursday’s participants said they would aggressively push for once the new president is sworn in.
BAMN activists also called upon UC Berkeley to become a sanctuary campus and welcome African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans and other minority and immigrant communities.
“We want to make the era of change and hope real,” said BAMN organizer Yuvette Felarca, who also teaches at Malcolm X Elementary School in Berkeley. “When we see the nation elect the first black president and yet we see that the percentage of blacks and Latinos on campuses like UC Berkeley and UCLA is so low, we need to make a change.”
Shanta Driver, national chairperson for BAMN, asked students to seize this important moment in history to start a new kind of civil rights movement which would oppose racism and bring equal opportunities to all.
“Over the last few weeks we have seen a real change in America and it has presented us with an opportunity to leave our mark on our nation,” she said to applause from the audience. “If it’s possible for America, with such a strong and deep history of racism to do this, then anything is possible. We need to resolve deep social problems and engage in a real debate and discussion on racism. “
She said that Obama should enact the Dream Act within his first 100 days in office.
“If the people who worked for Obama’s victory decide after inauguration day that their work is over it won’t happen,” Driver said. “We have to continue to be leaders of the movement that put him in power.”
Driver added that if the Dream Act failed under Obama, then generations of young people would ask, “If a black president couldn’t do it, then who can?”
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed SB 1301, which incorporates the California Dream Act, on Sept. 30, citing a staggering state economy. Thousands of students who had mobilized in support of the bill were disappointed by his decision.
“The governor said that although he shared the author’s goal of making affordable education available to all California students, given the precarious fiscal condition the state is facing right now, it would not be prudent to place additional demands on our limited financial aid resources as specified in this bill,” said Francisco Castillo, a spokesperson for Schwarzenegger.
Castillo added that the governor supported a local bill which allows undocumented students to pay in-state tuition.
Gabriella, a UC Berkeley undocumented student from El Salvador who has been in U.S. since October 2005, said that even with in-state tuition, it is difficult to make ends meet
“The reason my dad brought me here is because he wanted me to have a better life,” she said. “But my transition to UC Berkeley has been very different than that of the other students. My dad earns less than $10,000 a year. I couldn’t get enough scholarship to live on campus so I am living with my best friend’s sister in Davis. I have to commute three to four hours every day. “
Gabriella—who wants to go to law school—said that when she started out as a sophomore at her high school in California, she didn’t speak English and never imagined going to community college, let alone UC Berkeley.
“Right now I can’t get a job because I don’t have a Social Security number and residence,” she said. “Sometimes I have to skip meals in order to pay for the shuttle. I had to sacrifice many things to be at UC Berkeley. Usually people have gym, clubs or homework sessions after class, but I can’t go to any of those. My future is pretty uncertain and if the situation doesn’t change I might have to drop out. I have hope that the Dream Act might get passed one day.”
Zaira, another undocumented student at the university, echoed her thoughts.
“It’s hard to describe the life of an undocumented student on campus,” she said. “We act the same as the other students but our efforts are not reciprocated by the education system. All undocumented students are equal and deserve the same rights. There’s no reason why we should get the leftovers of education. I want to ask those opposing the Dream Act to give me one reason why it shouldn’t be made a reality.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------
News Updates:
UC Berkeley Students Call On Obama to Enact the Dream Act
by Riya Bhattacharjee
Friday November 14, 2008
UC Berkeley students joined the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights, and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN) Thursday to launch a national campaign urging President-elect Barack Obama to enact the federal Dream Act, which would legalize federal financial aid and open a path of citizenship for undocumented immigrant college students across the nation, who are otherwise entrapped in complicated paperwork.
Held at the MLK Student Union on campus, the event—which was organized by BAMN and co-sponsored by Rising Immigrant Scholars through Education, the Latino Business Students Association, the gender and women’s studies and Spanish and Portuguese studies departments at the university and the Chancellor’s Student Opportunity Fund—started with a group of undocumented students from around the Bay Area testifying about their struggles in the absence of federal financial aid.
Calls to Chancellor Robert Birgeneau’s office for comment were not returned by press time, but a campus spokesperson confirmed that the chancellor supports the Dream Act. Birgeneau wrote an op-ed piece in support of the act for the UC Berkeley student newspaper The Daily Californian, Nov. 5.
In California, undocumented students have the right to attend a public university but are not allowed to apply for financial aid, something Thursday’s participants said they would aggressively push for once the new president is sworn in.
BAMN activists also called upon UC Berkeley to become a sanctuary campus and welcome African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans and other minority and immigrant communities.
“We want to make the era of change and hope real,” said BAMN organizer Yuvette Felarca, who also teaches at Malcolm X Elementary School in Berkeley. “When we see the nation elect the first black president and yet we see that the percentage of blacks and Latinos on campuses like UC Berkeley and UCLA is so low, we need to make a change.”
Shanta Driver, national chairperson for BAMN, asked students to seize this important moment in history to start a new kind of civil rights movement which would oppose racism and bring equal opportunities to all.
“Over the last few weeks we have seen a real change in America and it has presented us with an opportunity to leave our mark on our nation,” she said to applause from the audience. “If it’s possible for America, with such a strong and deep history of racism to do this, then anything is possible. We need to resolve deep social problems and engage in a real debate and discussion on racism. “
She said that Obama should enact the Dream Act within his first 100 days in office.
“If the people who worked for Obama’s victory decide after inauguration day that their work is over it won’t happen,” Driver said. “We have to continue to be leaders of the movement that put him in power.”
Driver added that if the Dream Act failed under Obama, then generations of young people would ask, “If a black president couldn’t do it, then who can?”
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed SB 1301, which incorporates the California Dream Act, on Sept. 30, citing a staggering state economy. Thousands of students who had mobilized in support of the bill were disappointed by his decision.
“The governor said that although he shared the author’s goal of making affordable education available to all California students, given the precarious fiscal condition the state is facing right now, it would not be prudent to place additional demands on our limited financial aid resources as specified in this bill,” said Francisco Castillo, a spokesperson for Schwarzenegger.
Castillo added that the governor supported a local bill which allows undocumented students to pay in-state tuition.
Gabriella, a UC Berkeley undocumented student from El Salvador who has been in U.S. since October 2005, said that even with in-state tuition, it is difficult to make ends meet
“The reason my dad brought me here is because he wanted me to have a better life,” she said. “But my transition to UC Berkeley has been very different than that of the other students. My dad earns less than $10,000 a year. I couldn’t get enough scholarship to live on campus so I am living with my best friend’s sister in Davis. I have to commute three to four hours every day. “
Gabriella—who wants to go to law school—said that when she started out as a sophomore at her high school in California, she didn’t speak English and never imagined going to community college, let alone UC Berkeley.
“Right now I can’t get a job because I don’t have a Social Security number and residence,” she said. “Sometimes I have to skip meals in order to pay for the shuttle. I had to sacrifice many things to be at UC Berkeley. Usually people have gym, clubs or homework sessions after class, but I can’t go to any of those. My future is pretty uncertain and if the situation doesn’t change I might have to drop out. I have hope that the Dream Act might get passed one day.”
Zaira, another undocumented student at the university, echoed her thoughts.
“It’s hard to describe the life of an undocumented student on campus,” she said. “We act the same as the other students but our efforts are not reciprocated by the education system. All undocumented students are equal and deserve the same rights. There’s no reason why we should get the leftovers of education. I want to ask those opposing the Dream Act to give me one reason why it shouldn’t be made a reality.”
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
A Death in Patchogue (From NY Times)
What are the implications of this story for teachers/educators? --Dr. Louie F. Rodriguez
-------------------------------------------
NY Times
November 11, 2008
Editorial
A Death in Patchogue
Marcello Lucero was killed late Saturday night near the commuter railroad station in Patchogue, N.Y., a middle-class village in central Long Island. He was beaten and stabbed. The friend who crouched beside him in a parking lot as he lay dying, soaked in blood, said Mr. Lucero, who was 37, had come to the United States 16 years ago from Ecuador.
The police arrested seven teenage boys, who they said had driven into the village from out of town looking for Latinos to beat up. The police said the mob cornered Mr. Lucero and another man, who escaped and later identified the suspects to the police. A prosecutor at the arraignment on Monday quoted the young men as having said: “Let’s go find some Mexicans.” They have pleaded not guilty.
The county executive, Steve Levy, quickly issued a news release denouncing this latest apparent hate crime in Suffolk County. That should be the first and least of the actions he and other leaders take.
A possible lynching in a New York suburb should be more than enough to force this country to acknowledge the bitter chill that has overcome Latinos in these days of rage against illegal immigration.
The atmosphere began to darken when Republican politicians decided a few years ago to exploit immigration as a wedge issue. They drafted harsh legislation to criminalize the undocumented. They cheered as vigilantes streamed to the border to confront the concocted crisis of Spanish-speaking workers sneaking in to steal jobs and spread diseases. Cable personalities and radio talk-show hosts latched on to the issue. Years of effort in Congress to assemble a responsible overhaul of the immigration system failed repeatedly. Its opponents wanted only to demonize and punish the Latino workers on which the country had come to depend.
A campaign of raids and deportations, led by federal agents with help from state and local posses, has become so pervasive that nearly 1 in 10 Latinos, including citizens and legal immigrants, have told of being stopped and asked about their immigration status, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. Now that the economy is in free fall, the possibility of scapegoating is deepening Hispanic anxiety.
It is not yet clear how closely connected Mr. Lucero’s murder is to this broad wave of xenophobia. But there is both a message and opportunity here for officials like Mr. Levy, an immigration hard-liner whose relations with his rapidly growing Latino immigrant constituency have been strained by past crises and confrontations.
Deadly violence represents the worst fear that immigrants deal with every day, but it is not the only one. It must be every leader’s task to move beyond easy outrage and take on the difficult job of understanding and defending a community so vulnerable to sudden outbreaks of hostility and terror.
-------------------------------------------
NY Times
November 11, 2008
Editorial
A Death in Patchogue
Marcello Lucero was killed late Saturday night near the commuter railroad station in Patchogue, N.Y., a middle-class village in central Long Island. He was beaten and stabbed. The friend who crouched beside him in a parking lot as he lay dying, soaked in blood, said Mr. Lucero, who was 37, had come to the United States 16 years ago from Ecuador.
The police arrested seven teenage boys, who they said had driven into the village from out of town looking for Latinos to beat up. The police said the mob cornered Mr. Lucero and another man, who escaped and later identified the suspects to the police. A prosecutor at the arraignment on Monday quoted the young men as having said: “Let’s go find some Mexicans.” They have pleaded not guilty.
The county executive, Steve Levy, quickly issued a news release denouncing this latest apparent hate crime in Suffolk County. That should be the first and least of the actions he and other leaders take.
A possible lynching in a New York suburb should be more than enough to force this country to acknowledge the bitter chill that has overcome Latinos in these days of rage against illegal immigration.
The atmosphere began to darken when Republican politicians decided a few years ago to exploit immigration as a wedge issue. They drafted harsh legislation to criminalize the undocumented. They cheered as vigilantes streamed to the border to confront the concocted crisis of Spanish-speaking workers sneaking in to steal jobs and spread diseases. Cable personalities and radio talk-show hosts latched on to the issue. Years of effort in Congress to assemble a responsible overhaul of the immigration system failed repeatedly. Its opponents wanted only to demonize and punish the Latino workers on which the country had come to depend.
A campaign of raids and deportations, led by federal agents with help from state and local posses, has become so pervasive that nearly 1 in 10 Latinos, including citizens and legal immigrants, have told of being stopped and asked about their immigration status, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. Now that the economy is in free fall, the possibility of scapegoating is deepening Hispanic anxiety.
It is not yet clear how closely connected Mr. Lucero’s murder is to this broad wave of xenophobia. But there is both a message and opportunity here for officials like Mr. Levy, an immigration hard-liner whose relations with his rapidly growing Latino immigrant constituency have been strained by past crises and confrontations.
Deadly violence represents the worst fear that immigrants deal with every day, but it is not the only one. It must be every leader’s task to move beyond easy outrage and take on the difficult job of understanding and defending a community so vulnerable to sudden outbreaks of hostility and terror.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Hispanics to Press New President on Immigration, No Matter the Victor (from Diverse Issues in Higher Education)
Current News
Hispanics to Press New President on Immigration, No Matter the Victor
by Karen Branch-Brioso
Oct 30, 2008, 06:11
By Karen Branch-Brioso
If Hispanic voters turn out in the numbers predicted in next Tuesday’s presidential election, the winner may be pressured into tackling the politically prickly issue of immigration reform in his first year in office whether he wants to or not, an immigrant advocate predicted Wednesday.
“Many of us are predicting the impact of the Latino vote will be unprecedented,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of America’s Voice, which is pushing for federally sponsored immigration reform for an estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States.
The numbers in which they turnout on Election Day “will show that Latinos generally and Latino immigrants, specifically, as well as other immigrant communities, want respect, not to be demonized and will demand reform. I suspect that we may even see a spirited legislative battle beginning in the fall of 2009,” Sharry said.
Democratic candidate Barack Obama and Republican candidate John McCain have both backed comprehensive immigration reform and say they will address the issue within the first year of their presidencies.
Both candidates have also supported the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (also known as the DREAM Act), which would allow many undocumented high school students who have lived in the United States since childhood a path to legal permanent residency. The legislation, which is limited to students who want to go to college or serve in the U.S. military upon graduation, hasn’t gained traction in Congress.
On the same day Sharry and other immigration advocates laid out projections and predictions during a telephone conference Wednesday afternoon, a New York Times story said that political rifts over immigration as well as more pressing issues — the economy and the Iraq war — are making a first-year approach to immigration unlikely.
“While The New York Times story today suggests it’s not going to be a 100-day issue, I suspect it will be more like a 101-day issue early in the first term,” Sharry said.
He pointed to a number of reports and projections on the Hispanic vote: the National Association of Latino Elected Officials estimates that 9.2 million Hispanics will cast their ballots in Tuesday’s election, compared to 7.6 million in 2004.
He noted that record numbers of naturalization applications — 1.4 million last year — have boosted the number of immigrants eligible to vote this year.
Cecilia Muñoz, Senior Vice President of the Office of Research, Advocacy, and Legislation at the National Council of La Raza, said that if Congress and the new president fail to push for comprehensive immigration reform then the issue of millions of undocumented immigrants living in the United States will continue to crop up in less desirable forms.
“If you look at the domestic policy debates that have gone through the Congress, there’s been some kind of immigration battle on every single one of them,” Muñoz said, citing recent legislation on housing, education, the foreclosure crisis, the economic stimulus package and the reauthorization of the State Child Health Insurance Program — all of which included a debate to deny benefits to undocumented immigrants.
“It’s going to become a fuel for what is usually a pretty ugly and not particularly constructive debate … As long as the immigration issue is hanging out there, it’s going to infiltrate the public policy debate — and not in a particularly constructive way.”
Email the editor: editor@diverseeducation.com
Hispanics to Press New President on Immigration, No Matter the Victor
by Karen Branch-Brioso
Oct 30, 2008, 06:11
By Karen Branch-Brioso
If Hispanic voters turn out in the numbers predicted in next Tuesday’s presidential election, the winner may be pressured into tackling the politically prickly issue of immigration reform in his first year in office whether he wants to or not, an immigrant advocate predicted Wednesday.
“Many of us are predicting the impact of the Latino vote will be unprecedented,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of America’s Voice, which is pushing for federally sponsored immigration reform for an estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States.
The numbers in which they turnout on Election Day “will show that Latinos generally and Latino immigrants, specifically, as well as other immigrant communities, want respect, not to be demonized and will demand reform. I suspect that we may even see a spirited legislative battle beginning in the fall of 2009,” Sharry said.
Democratic candidate Barack Obama and Republican candidate John McCain have both backed comprehensive immigration reform and say they will address the issue within the first year of their presidencies.
Both candidates have also supported the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (also known as the DREAM Act), which would allow many undocumented high school students who have lived in the United States since childhood a path to legal permanent residency. The legislation, which is limited to students who want to go to college or serve in the U.S. military upon graduation, hasn’t gained traction in Congress.
On the same day Sharry and other immigration advocates laid out projections and predictions during a telephone conference Wednesday afternoon, a New York Times story said that political rifts over immigration as well as more pressing issues — the economy and the Iraq war — are making a first-year approach to immigration unlikely.
“While The New York Times story today suggests it’s not going to be a 100-day issue, I suspect it will be more like a 101-day issue early in the first term,” Sharry said.
He pointed to a number of reports and projections on the Hispanic vote: the National Association of Latino Elected Officials estimates that 9.2 million Hispanics will cast their ballots in Tuesday’s election, compared to 7.6 million in 2004.
He noted that record numbers of naturalization applications — 1.4 million last year — have boosted the number of immigrants eligible to vote this year.
Cecilia Muñoz, Senior Vice President of the Office of Research, Advocacy, and Legislation at the National Council of La Raza, said that if Congress and the new president fail to push for comprehensive immigration reform then the issue of millions of undocumented immigrants living in the United States will continue to crop up in less desirable forms.
“If you look at the domestic policy debates that have gone through the Congress, there’s been some kind of immigration battle on every single one of them,” Muñoz said, citing recent legislation on housing, education, the foreclosure crisis, the economic stimulus package and the reauthorization of the State Child Health Insurance Program — all of which included a debate to deny benefits to undocumented immigrants.
“It’s going to become a fuel for what is usually a pretty ugly and not particularly constructive debate … As long as the immigration issue is hanging out there, it’s going to infiltrate the public policy debate — and not in a particularly constructive way.”
Email the editor: editor@diverseeducation.com
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Testing Experts Sees 'Illusions of Progress' Under NCLB (from Education Week)
FYI.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Education Week
Published Online: September 30, 2008
Published in Print: October 1, 2008
Testing Expert Sees ‘Illusions of Progress’ Under NCLB
By Scott J. Cech
Washington
Harvard University researcher Daniel M. Koretz has some good news and some bad news for policymakers looking ahead to the reauthorization of the federal No Child Left Behind Act: The nation’s K-12 students are now attending Lake Wobegon schools.
Because of rampantly inflated standardized test scores, Mr. Koretz contended at a panel discussion here last week, all children seem to be above average, as in the fictional town made famous by the radio personality Garrison Keillor—or at least better academically than they actually are.
“We know that we are creating, in many cases, with our test-based accountability system, illusions of progress,” Mr. Koretz told a roomful of policymakers and educators at a Sept. 22 forum hosted by the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank.
Mr. Koretz, a professor of education at Harvard’s graduate school of education who has written a new book, Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us, said that under the No Child Left Behind law, widespread teaching to the test, strategic reallocation of teaching talent, and other means of gaming the high-stakes testing system have conspired to produce scores on state standardized tests that are substantially better than students’ mastery of the material.
“If you tell people that performance on that tested sample is what matters, that’s what they worry about, so you can get inappropriate responses in the classroom and inflated test scores,” he said.
Mr. Koretz pointed to research in the 1990s on the state standardized test then used in Kentucky, which was designed to measure similar aspects of proficiency as the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the federally sponsored testing program often called “the nation’s report card.”
Scores on both tests should have moved more or less in lock step, he said. But instead, 4th grade reading scores rose sharply on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System test, which resembled an NCLB-test prototype, from 1992 to 1994, while sliding slightly on NAEP over the same period.
“If you’re a parent in Kentucky, what you care about is whether your kids can read, not how well they can do on the state test,” Mr. Koretz said. “And the national assessment told us that, in fact, the gains in the state test were bogus.”
Shortage of Studies
In his book, Mr. Koretz says a similar situation occurred during the “Texas miracle” of the 1990s: Minority students posted large gains on the high-stakes Texas Assessment of Academic Skills, but much smaller ones on NAEP.
Mr. Koretz said the relative dearth to date of comparative studies on large-scale state assessments isn’t for lack of trying. He said he and other scholars have often been rebuffed after approaching officials about the possibility of studying their assessment systems.
“There have not been a lot of studies of this,” Mr. Koretz said, “for the simple reason that it’s politically rather hard to do, to come to a state chief and say, ‘I’d like the chance to see whether your test scores are inflated.’?”
Bella Rosenberg, an education consultant and a longtime special assistant to Albert Shanker, the late president of the American Federation of Teachers, echoed many of Mr. Koretz’s critiques.
“This is officially sanctioned malpractice—if we did this in health, in medical practice, we’d all be dead by now,” she said of the testing system under the NCLB law. “The fact is, we’re doing a great job of obscuring instead of illuminating achievement gaps.”
But fellow panelist Roberto Rodriguez, a senior education adviser to U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee who helped shepherd the NCLB law through Congress in 2001, cautioned against “throwing the baby out with the bath water.”
While a more effective accountability system “needs to be a goal, I would argue, of the upcoming reauthorization of the [Elementary and Secondary Education Act],” he said, that “summative assessment is a critically important area of accountability.” The No Child Left Behind law is the current version of the ESEA, first enacted in 1965.
On the tug of war between advocates of the current system and detractors who prefer that tests better reflect the course content that students are supposed to be mastering, Mr. Rodriguez said, “I think we can have our cake and eat it too.”
Incentives for Instruction
But Mr. Koretz said some parts of the nearly 7-year-old NCLB law need to be fundamentally reworked.
“I think we ought to mandate, as part of No Child Left Behind, independent evaluations of state accountability programs,” he said. “There is nobody involved in this system who has an incentive to look for good instruction anymore—all the incentives are lined up in one direction: Increase scores on the summative tests at any costs.
“We need to create a system in which somebody … has incentives to make sure we’re not just gaming the system.”
Williamson M. Evers, the U.S. Department of Education’s assistant secretary for planning, evaluation, and policy development, who attended the panel discussion, suggested that any changes to the ESEA law should preserve its essence.
“Some are proposing changes in accountability that remove consequences; this would make it accountability in name only,” Mr. Evers said in an e-mail. “Results should be comparable statewide, or parents, taxpayers, and teachers themselves can’t tell how students are doing.”
Bruce Fuller, a professor of education and public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, praised the points Mr. Koretz makes about testing under NCLB in his book, and suggested steps to address the law’s flaws.
“Washington should first ensure that states use a common benchmark that defines proficient student achievement in reading, writing, and math,” Mr. Fuller, who is the director of the Policy Analysis for California Education research center based at Berkeley and Stanford University, said in an e-mail. “Second, neo-No Child policies should ensure that each state sets a valid way of tracking student growth over time, and provide states the resources to build necessary data systems.”
Vol. 28, Issue 06, Page 8
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Education Week
Published Online: September 30, 2008
Published in Print: October 1, 2008
Testing Expert Sees ‘Illusions of Progress’ Under NCLB
By Scott J. Cech
Washington
Harvard University researcher Daniel M. Koretz has some good news and some bad news for policymakers looking ahead to the reauthorization of the federal No Child Left Behind Act: The nation’s K-12 students are now attending Lake Wobegon schools.
Because of rampantly inflated standardized test scores, Mr. Koretz contended at a panel discussion here last week, all children seem to be above average, as in the fictional town made famous by the radio personality Garrison Keillor—or at least better academically than they actually are.
“We know that we are creating, in many cases, with our test-based accountability system, illusions of progress,” Mr. Koretz told a roomful of policymakers and educators at a Sept. 22 forum hosted by the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank.
Mr. Koretz, a professor of education at Harvard’s graduate school of education who has written a new book, Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us, said that under the No Child Left Behind law, widespread teaching to the test, strategic reallocation of teaching talent, and other means of gaming the high-stakes testing system have conspired to produce scores on state standardized tests that are substantially better than students’ mastery of the material.
“If you tell people that performance on that tested sample is what matters, that’s what they worry about, so you can get inappropriate responses in the classroom and inflated test scores,” he said.
Mr. Koretz pointed to research in the 1990s on the state standardized test then used in Kentucky, which was designed to measure similar aspects of proficiency as the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the federally sponsored testing program often called “the nation’s report card.”
Scores on both tests should have moved more or less in lock step, he said. But instead, 4th grade reading scores rose sharply on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System test, which resembled an NCLB-test prototype, from 1992 to 1994, while sliding slightly on NAEP over the same period.
“If you’re a parent in Kentucky, what you care about is whether your kids can read, not how well they can do on the state test,” Mr. Koretz said. “And the national assessment told us that, in fact, the gains in the state test were bogus.”
Shortage of Studies
In his book, Mr. Koretz says a similar situation occurred during the “Texas miracle” of the 1990s: Minority students posted large gains on the high-stakes Texas Assessment of Academic Skills, but much smaller ones on NAEP.
Mr. Koretz said the relative dearth to date of comparative studies on large-scale state assessments isn’t for lack of trying. He said he and other scholars have often been rebuffed after approaching officials about the possibility of studying their assessment systems.
“There have not been a lot of studies of this,” Mr. Koretz said, “for the simple reason that it’s politically rather hard to do, to come to a state chief and say, ‘I’d like the chance to see whether your test scores are inflated.’?”
Bella Rosenberg, an education consultant and a longtime special assistant to Albert Shanker, the late president of the American Federation of Teachers, echoed many of Mr. Koretz’s critiques.
“This is officially sanctioned malpractice—if we did this in health, in medical practice, we’d all be dead by now,” she said of the testing system under the NCLB law. “The fact is, we’re doing a great job of obscuring instead of illuminating achievement gaps.”
But fellow panelist Roberto Rodriguez, a senior education adviser to U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee who helped shepherd the NCLB law through Congress in 2001, cautioned against “throwing the baby out with the bath water.”
While a more effective accountability system “needs to be a goal, I would argue, of the upcoming reauthorization of the [Elementary and Secondary Education Act],” he said, that “summative assessment is a critically important area of accountability.” The No Child Left Behind law is the current version of the ESEA, first enacted in 1965.
On the tug of war between advocates of the current system and detractors who prefer that tests better reflect the course content that students are supposed to be mastering, Mr. Rodriguez said, “I think we can have our cake and eat it too.”
Incentives for Instruction
But Mr. Koretz said some parts of the nearly 7-year-old NCLB law need to be fundamentally reworked.
“I think we ought to mandate, as part of No Child Left Behind, independent evaluations of state accountability programs,” he said. “There is nobody involved in this system who has an incentive to look for good instruction anymore—all the incentives are lined up in one direction: Increase scores on the summative tests at any costs.
“We need to create a system in which somebody … has incentives to make sure we’re not just gaming the system.”
Williamson M. Evers, the U.S. Department of Education’s assistant secretary for planning, evaluation, and policy development, who attended the panel discussion, suggested that any changes to the ESEA law should preserve its essence.
“Some are proposing changes in accountability that remove consequences; this would make it accountability in name only,” Mr. Evers said in an e-mail. “Results should be comparable statewide, or parents, taxpayers, and teachers themselves can’t tell how students are doing.”
Bruce Fuller, a professor of education and public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, praised the points Mr. Koretz makes about testing under NCLB in his book, and suggested steps to address the law’s flaws.
“Washington should first ensure that states use a common benchmark that defines proficient student achievement in reading, writing, and math,” Mr. Fuller, who is the director of the Policy Analysis for California Education research center based at Berkeley and Stanford University, said in an e-mail. “Second, neo-No Child policies should ensure that each state sets a valid way of tracking student growth over time, and provide states the resources to build necessary data systems.”
Vol. 28, Issue 06, Page 8
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)